FOR IMMEDIATE
NEWS RELEASE
NEWS RELEASE
# 058
FROM: CLERK
OF SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
The opinions
handed down on the 29th day of June, 1999
, are as follows:
BY
CALOGERO, C.J. :
98-C
- 2313 ANN LANG FITZGERALD v. THOMAS C. TUCKER, ET
UX (Parish of Lafayette)
JUDGMENT OF
COURT OF APPEAL AWARDING PLAINTIFF DAMAGES IS REVERSED;
JUDGMENT RENDERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT THOMAS C.
TUCKER; SUIT DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
MARCUS, J.
- not on panel. Rule IV, Part 2, §3.
98-C
- 2326 SARAH DERRICK CRUMP v. SABINE RIVER AUTHORITY
(Parish of Sabine)
JUDGMENT OF
THE COURT OF APPEAL REVERSED; PLAINTIFF'S SUIT DISMISSED.
VICTORY, J.
- not on panel. Rule IV, Part 2, §3.
BY
MARCUS, J. :
98-CC-
1602 MICHELLE O'REGAN AND RYAN O'REGAN v. PREFERRED
ENTERPRISES, INC. D/B/A NUMBER ONE CLEANERS, ET AL
(Parish of Jefferson)
For the foregoing
reasons, the judgment of the court of appeal is reversed.
Partial summary judgment is hereby rendered in favor
of Preferred Enterprises, Inc. dismissing the negligence
claims of Michelle and Ryan O'Regan. The matter is
remanded to the district court for further proceedings
consistent with this opinion. All costs are assessed
against the plaintiffs.
JOHNSON, J.
- not on panel. Rule IV, Part 2, §3.
CALOGERO, C.J.
- dissents for reasons assigned by Knoll, J.
LEMMON,
J. - subscribes to the opinion and assigns additional
reasons.
KIMBALL, J.
- dissents for reasons assigned by Knoll, J.
KNOLL,
J. - dissents and assigns reasons.
98-C
- 3193 TOUFIC NASSIF v. SUNRISE HOMES, INC., COAST
QUALITY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, AND SHIRLEY NASSIF
(Parish of Jefferson)
For the reasons
assigned, the judgment of the court of appeal is reversed
insofar as it held that Coast Quality Construction
Company was not entitled to indemnification for the
attorney fees it paid Lowe, Stein, Hoffman, Allweiss
and Hauver, L.L.P. The portion of the judgment of
the district court ordering J.J. Krebs & Sons,
Inc. to indemnify Coast Quality Construction Company
for such attorney fees is reinstated. The judgment
of the court of appeal is otherwise affirmed. All
costs of the proceedings before this court are assessed
against J.J. Krebs & Sons, Inc.
LEMMON, J.
- not on panel. Rule IV, Part 2, §3.
BY
LEMMON, J. :
98-C
- 1193 MATTIE CONNELL CASKEY, ET AL v. KELLY OIL COMPANY,
ET AL (Parish of Webster)
For these reasons,
the judgment of the court of appeal is reversed, and
the judgment of the trial court is reinstated.
VICTORY, J.
- not on panel. Rule IV, Part 2, §3.
98-C
- 2271 TYRONNE C. WILLIAMS v. RUSH MASONRY, INC.
(Office of
Workers' Compensation District # 8)
We accordingly
reverse the judgments of the lower courts insofar
as they awarded penalties and attorney's fees, and
plaintiff's demands for penalties and attorney's fees
are dismissed.
CALOGERO, C.J.
- not on panel. Rule IV, Part 2, §3.
BY
KNOLL, J. :
97-KA-
0499 STATE OF LOUISIANA v. DEREK LANDRY (Parish
of Orleans)
(First Degree
Murder)
Accordingly,
we reverse defendant's conviction and sentence and
remand this matter to the trial court for a new trial.
REVERSED AND
REMANDED FOR NEW TRIAL.
KIMBALL, J.
- not on panel. Rule IV, Part 2, §3.
CALOGERO,
C.J. - concurs and assigns reasons.
98-C
- 1976 CARLAS ANN SEXTON FOLSE v. DARRYL GERARD FOLSE
(Parish of East Baton Rouge)
For the reasons
expressed above, we find that the trial court's approach
suffers from no infirmities warranting reversal. We
find it significant that parental rights were not
terminated, but limited. The family court judge did
not abuse his discretion in finding the child unavailable
to testify in court. Under the circumstances of this
case, the relaxed evidentiary standards used to determine
custody, as expressed in LA.CODE EVID. art. 1101,
are applicable to custody determinations under the
PSFVRA. Finally, the trial court used the correct
standard in making its determinations.
REVERSED; FAMILY
COURT'S JUDGMENT REINSTATED.
LEMMON, J.
- not on panel. Rule IV, Part 2, §3.
CALOGERO, C.J.
- dissents for reasons assigned by the Court of Appeal.
MARCUS, J.
- dissents for reasons assigned by the Court of Appeal.
VICTORY, J.
- dissents for reasons assigned by the Court of Appeal.
BY
PER CURIAM :
98-CQ-
3080 IN THE MATTER OF: HORACE E. WILSON; ALYNE DALE
WILSON; HORACE E. WILSON; ALYNE DALE WILSON v. BRENT
BRYAN AND JENNIFER BRYAN BARBER (Certified Question
From the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth
Circuit)
Accordingly,
we answer the certified question as set forth in this
opinion. Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XII, the judgment
rendered by this court upon the question certified
shall be sent by the clerk of this court under its
seal to the United States Court of Appeals for the
Firth Circuit and to the parties. CERTIFIED QUESTION
ANSWERED.
MARCUS, J.
- not on panel. Rule IV, Part 2, §3.
LEMMON,
J. - concurs and assigns reasons.