December 28, 2021 and January 10 and 12, 2022 - Actions

<div>
                         <div class="content">
                             <div class="bcrumb">
                                 <ol class="row breadcrumb offprint">
                                     <li><a href="/">Home</a></li>
                                             <li><a href="CourtActions/2022">Court Actions</a></li>

<li class="active">
December 28, 2021 and January 10 and 12, 2022 
                                             </li>

</ol>

</div>
                         </div>

<div id="mainbodycontent" class="col col-md-12 mainbodycontent" style="margin-top:-10px;">                    
<div><table cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" style="text-align:justify;" width="100%"><tbody><tr valign="top" style=""><td valign="top" width="63%">FOR IMMEDIATE NEWS RELEASE</td><td valign="top" width="37%"><div align="right">NEWS RELEASE #002</div></td></tr><tr valign="top"><td valign="top" style="">FROM: CLERK OF SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA</td><td valign="top">&nbsp;</td></tr></tbody></table><p>&nbsp;</p><div class="nrbody"><style>.nrbody h1 { display:block; font-size:1em; font-weight:bold; text-decoration:underline; } .nrbody p { text-align:justify; } .nrdate { font-weight:bold; text-decoration:underline; } </style><p>&nbsp;</p><p>On the <span class="nrdate">28th day of December, 2021</span> the following action was taken by the Supreme Court of Louisiana in the case(s) listed below:</p><h1>Application for rehearing denied:</h1><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1838.CC.action.re.pdf">2021-CC-01838&nbsp;BRADLEY DAY AND TRACY DAY, INDIVIDUALLY AND O/B/O THEIR MINOR CHILDREN BROOKLYN AND BRILEY DAY VS. ELVIS THOMPSON, ET AL.</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Calcasieu)<br />Hughes, J., would grant rehearing.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>On the <span class="nrdate">10th day of January, 2022</span> the following action was taken by the Supreme Court of Louisiana in the case(s) listed below:</p><h1>Stay denied. Writ application denied:</h1><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-0006.KK.action.pdf">2022-KK-00006&nbsp;STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. MATTHEW MIRE</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Ascension)<br /><a href="/opinions/2022/22-0006.KK.jlw.con.pdf">Weimer, C.J., additionally concurs and assigns reasons.</a></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>On the <span class="nrdate">12th day of January, 2022</span> the following action was taken by the Supreme Court of Louisiana in the case(s) listed below:</p><h1>Writ application granted. See briefing notice and Order:</h1><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1226.KP.action.pdf">2021-KP-01226&nbsp;STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. JASON MICHAEL PILCHER</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Natchitoches)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1460.KK.action.pdf">2021-KK-01460&nbsp;STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. BRIAN CLARKE</a>&nbsp;(Parish of St. Charles)</p><h1>Writ application granted. See per curiam:</h1><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1470.KH.PC.pdf">2021-KH-01470&nbsp;STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. DERRICK BROUSSARD</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Acadia)<br />Weimer, C.J., dissents and would deny.<br />Crain, J., dissents and would deny.<br />McCallum, J., dissents and would deny.</p><h1>Petition for transfer to active status granted. See order:</h1><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1899.OB.PC.pdf">2021-OB-01899&nbsp;IN RE: CLAUDE PIERSON DEVALL, JR.</a></p><h1>Petition to terminate probation granted. See Order:</h1><p><a href="/opinions/2022/19-1573.BA.PC.pdf">2019-BA-01573&nbsp;IN RE: COMMITTEE IN BAR ADMISSIONS CFN144518</a></p><h1>Joint petition for consent discipline accepted. See per curiam:</h1><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1582.B.PC.pdf">2021-B-01582&nbsp;IN RE: CAROL SAVANT LOY</a><br />Genovese, J., would reject joint petition.</p><h1>Suspension imposed. See per curiam:</h1><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1488.B.PC.pdf">2021-B-01488&nbsp;IN RE: ANNA M. JACKSON</a><br /><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1488.B.sjc.con.pdf">Crichton, J., additionally concurs and assigns reasons.</a></p><h1>Application for reconsideration denied:</h1><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-0976.C.action.re.pdf">2021-C-00976&nbsp;SHARON D. VANCE AND STEVE VANCE VS. SHERIFF DANIEL H. EDWARDS, SGT. SONJA DYSON EVANS, LT. BRANDON PINION, LATECIAL MILTON, CRYSTAL KNIGHT, RAQUELLE D. COLLINS, ROBERT SMITH, KEDRICK CARLSON AND THEIR INSURERS</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Tangipahoa)</p><h1>Application for reconsideration not considered. See Louisiana Supreme Court Rule IX, &sect; 6:</h1><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-0064.KP.action.re.pdf">2021-KP-00064&nbsp;STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. KEVIN ALEXANDER, JR.</a>&nbsp;(Parish of St. John the Baptist)<br /><a href="/opinions/2022/21-0064.KP.sjc.grant.pdf">Crichton, J., would grant and assigns reasons.</a><br /><a href="/opinions/2022/21-0064.KP.jtg.grant.pdf">Genovese, J., would grant and assigns reasons.</a><br />Griffin, J., would grant for the reasons assigned by Justice Crichton and Justice Genovese.</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-0783.KO.action.re.pdf">2021-KO-00783&nbsp;STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. LANCE S. BARTON</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Acadia)<br />Hughes, J., would grant.</p><h1>Writ application not considered. Not timely filed. See Louisiana Supreme Court Rule X, &sect; 5 and Rule XLII &sect; 6(e):</h1><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1722.C.action.pdf">2021-C-01722&nbsp;JA'MIRA PAUL ON BEHALF OF MINOR CHILD J. PAUL VS. LDG PORT ROYAL DEVELOPMENT L.L.C. AND AXIS CAPITAL</a>&nbsp;(Parish of East Baton Rouge)</p><h1>Writ application not considered. Not timely filed. See Louisiana Supreme Court Rule X, &sect; 5(a):</h1><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1451.KH.action.pdf">2021-KH-01451&nbsp;STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. LORENZO JEFFERSON</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Caddo)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1539.KH.action.pdf">2021-KH-01539&nbsp;STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. LORENZO JEFFERSON</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Caddo)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1570.C.action.pdf">2021-C-01570&nbsp;THUY TRAN, WIFE OF/AND THAI BUI; QUAN HOANG, ON BEHALF OF HIS MINOR CHILDREN, BRANDON HOANG AND RYAN HOANG VS. KAREN COLLINS, ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY AND ORLEANS PARISH SCHOOL BOARD</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Orleans Civil)</p><h1>Writ application not considered. Petitioner has not demonstrated that he sought review in the court(s) below before filing in this Court nor shown the "extraordinary circumstances" that would justify bypassing that level of review. See La.S.Ct.R. X &sect; 5(b):</h1><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1249.KH.action.pdf">2021-KH-01249&nbsp;STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. DONALD CROCHET</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Lafourche)<br />Weimer, C. J., recused in case number 2021-KH-01249 only.</p><h1>Writ application denied - Applicant has previously exhausted his right to state collateral review. See State ex rel. Walker v. State, 2015-0923 (La. 2/5/16), 183 So.3d 1286.:</h1><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1208.KH.action.pdf">2021-KH-01208&nbsp;STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. CALVIN ANTHONY WALKER</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Webster)</p><h1>Stay denied. Writ application denied:</h1><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1736.CC.action.pdf">2021-CC-01736&nbsp;CHARLES SCHWAB &amp; CO., INC. VS. GIROD LOANCO, LLC AND REGINA B. HEISLER</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Orleans Civil)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1865.CC.action.pdf">2021-CC-01865&nbsp;RANDY NULL VS. BROWN &amp; BROWN OF OHIO, LLC</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Livingston)</p><h1>Writ application denied. See per curiam:</h1><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1273.KH.PC.pdf">2021-KH-01273&nbsp;STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. HELEN BURNS</a>&nbsp;(Parish of St. Tammany)<br />Weimer, C. J., recused in case number 2021-KH-01273 only.<br />Griffin, J., would grant.</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1581.KH.PC.pdf">2021-KH-01581&nbsp;STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. RAYMOND GUIDRY</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Lafayette)</p><h1>Writ application denied:</h1><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-0860.KP.action.pdf">2021-KP-00860&nbsp;ROY WALKER VS. STATE OF LOUISIANA</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Jefferson)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-0956.KH.action.pdf">2021-KH-00956&nbsp;STATE OF LOUISIANA EX REL., MR. CHRIS BARNES VS. TIMOTHY HOOPER, WARDEN LOUISIANA STATE PRISON AT ANGOLA, LA</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Jefferson)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1175.K.action.pdf">2021-K-01175&nbsp;STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. BRENNEN D. LARK</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Orleans Criminal)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1206.KH.action.pdf">2021-KH-01206&nbsp;STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. MICHAEL WORLEY</a>&nbsp;(Parish of LaSalle)<br /><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1206.KH.jdh.con.pdf">Hughes, J., additionally concurs and assigns reasons.</a><br />Crain, J., would grant and vacate the order for out of time appeal as untimely.</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1270.KH.action.pdf">2021-KH-01270&nbsp;STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. ALLEN JAMEL ROBINSON</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Ouachita)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1355.KP.action.pdf">2021-KP-01355&nbsp;STATE OF LOUISIANA, EX REL. ROY WALKER VS. KIRT GUERIN, WARDEN, ELAYN HUNT CORRECTIONAL CENTER</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Jefferson)<br /><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1355.KP.jlw.grant.pdf">Weimer, C.J., would grant and assigns reasons.</a><br />Griffin, J., would grant for reasons assigned by Chief Justice Weimer.</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1391.KP.action.pdf">2021-KP-01391&nbsp;STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. BRANDON J. OFFICE</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Vernon)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1477.KH.action.pdf">2021-KH-01477&nbsp;STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. EMILIO COREAS</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Jefferson)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1515.CC.action.pdf">2021-CC-01515&nbsp;TIFFANY RABB, ET AL. VS. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL.</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Calcasieu)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1517.CC.action.pdf">2021-CC-01517&nbsp;MARGARET DOLLAR; MICHAEL E. DOLLAR; AND DEBORAH DOLLAR VS. DALE ALEX STRINGFELLOW; ACE PROPERTY &amp; CASUALTY INSURANCE CO.; SILVERSIDE TIMBER, LLC; JOHNSON LOGGING, LLC; THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY; LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT; ABC INSURANCE COMPANY; AND XYZ INSURANCE COMPANY</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Union)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1523.CC.action.pdf">2021-CC-01523&nbsp;MARGARET DOLLAR; MICHAEL E. DOLLAR; AND DEBORAH DOLLAR VS. DALE ALEX STRINGFELLOW; ACE PROPERTY &amp; CASUALTY INSURANCE CO.; SILVERSIDE TIMBER, LLC; JOHNSON LOGGING, LLC; THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY; LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT; ABC INSURANCE COMPANY; AND XYZ INSURANCE COMPANY</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Union)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1527.C.action.pdf">2021-C-01527&nbsp;VICTORIA ROACH VS. STATE OF LOUISIANA, THROUGH THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT C/W MICHAEL LEE MCVEY AND NORMA CHERYL MCVEY VS. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL.</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Calcasieu)<br />Weimer, C.J., would grant and docket.<br />Crichton, J., would grant and docket.<br />McCallum, J., would grant and docket.</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1528.KH.action.pdf">2021-KH-01528&nbsp;STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. FREDERICK GREER</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Caddo)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1530.KH.action.pdf">2021-KH-01530&nbsp;STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. EDDIE MCBETH</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Washington)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1538.CC.action.pdf">2021-CC-01538&nbsp;MARGARET DOLLAR; MICHAEL E. DOLLAR; AND DEBORAH DOLLAR VS. DALE ALEX STRINGFELLOW; ACE PROPERTY &amp; CASUALTY INSURANCE CO.; SILVERSIDE TIMBER, LLC; JOHNSON LOGGING, LLC; THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY; LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT; ABC INSURANCE COMPANY; AND XYZ INSURANCE COMPANY</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Union)<br />Crain, J., would grant.</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1565.CC.action.pdf">2021-CC-01565&nbsp;WORLD WAR II THEATER, INC. VS. NORMAN WHITE, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER AND DIRECTOR OF FINANCE FOR CITY NEW ORLEANS, ERROL G. WILLIAMS, ASSESSOR OF ORLEANS PARISH, LOUISIANA TAX COMMISSION</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Orleans Civil)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1589.CC.action.pdf">2021-CC-01589&nbsp;LANDRY'S, L.L.C., ET AL. VS. AIG LEXINGTON, ET AL.</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Calcasieu)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1590.CC.action.pdf">2021-CC-01590&nbsp;LANDRY'S, L.L.C., ET AL. VS. INTERSTATE FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, ET AL.</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Calcasieu)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1591.C.action.pdf">2021-C-01591&nbsp;DIANNE JACKSON VS. UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S OF LONDON, VIC 3 ENTERPRISES, LLC, AND NAPOLEON WHITE</a>&nbsp;(Parish of St. John the Baptist)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1593.CC.action.pdf">2021-CC-01593&nbsp;LANDRY'S, L.L.C., ET AL. VS. AIG LEXINGTON, ET AL.</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Calcasieu)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1594.CC.action.pdf">2021-CC-01594&nbsp;LANDRY'S, L.L.C., ET AL. VS. AIG LEXINGTON, ET AL.</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Calcasieu)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1595.CC.action.pdf">2021-CC-01595&nbsp;LANDRY'S, L.L.C., ET AL. VS. AIG LEXINGTON, ET AL.</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Calcasieu)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1597.CC.action.pdf">2021-CC-01597&nbsp;LANDRY'S, L.L.C., ET AL. VS. INTERSTATE FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, ET AL.</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Calcasieu)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1598.CC.action.pdf">2021-CC-01598&nbsp;LANDRY'S, L.L.C., ET AL. VS. INTERSTATE FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, ET AL</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Calcasieu)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1599.CC.action.pdf">2021-CC-01599&nbsp;LANDRY'S, L.L.C., ET AL. VS. INTERSTATE FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, ET AL.</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Calcasieu)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1600.CC.action.pdf">2021-CC-01600&nbsp;LANDRY'S, L.L.C., ET AL. VS. INTERSTATE FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, ET AL.</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Calcasieu)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1604.CC.action.pdf">2021-CC-01604&nbsp;LANDRY'S, L.L.C., ET AL. VS. INTERSTATE FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, ET AL.</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Calcasieu)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1605.CC.action.pdf">2021-CC-01605&nbsp;LANDRY'S, L.L.C., ET AL. VS. INTERSTATE FIRE &amp; CASUALTY CO., ET AL.</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Calcasieu)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1606.CC.action.pdf">2021-CC-01606&nbsp;LANDRY'S, L.L.C., ET AL. VS. AIG LEXINGTON, ET AL.</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Calcasieu)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1607.CC.action.pdf">2021-CC-01607&nbsp;LANDRY'S, L.L.C., ET AL. VS. INTERSTATE FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, ET AL.</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Calcasieu)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1610.C.action.pdf">2021-C-01610&nbsp;LOUISIANA WETLANDS, LLC AND NEW 90, LLC VS. ENERGEN RESOURCES CORPORATION, CHEVRON USA, INC., SOUTHERN NATURAL GAS COMPANY, LLC, EP ENEGRY E&amp;P COMPANY, LP, AND BRAMMER ENGINEERING, INC.</a>&nbsp;(Parish of St. Mary)<br />Weimer, C.J., would grant.<br />Hughes, J., would grant.<br /><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1610.C.jtg.grant.pdf">Genovese, J., would grant and assigns reasons.</a></p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1613.CC.action.pdf">2021-CC-01613&nbsp;DONALD T. BROWN DDS VS. DOUGLAS D. MCGINITY, MCGINITY LAW FIRM LLC AND HANNAH CHOKR</a>&nbsp;(Parish of St. Tammany)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1614.C.action.pdf">2021-C-01614&nbsp;ACADIANA RENAL PHYSICIANS, A MEDICAL CORPORATION, ET AL. VS. OUR LADY OF LOURDES REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, INC. AND LAFAYETTE GENERAL MEDICAL CENTER, INC.</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Lafayette)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1615.C.action.pdf">2021-C-01615&nbsp;ACADIANA RENAL PHYSICIANS, A MEDICAL CORPORATION, ET AL. VS. OUR LADY OF LOURDES REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, INC. AND LAFAYETTE GENERAL MEDICAL CENTER, INC.</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Lafayette)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1617.KK.action.pdf">2021-KK-01617&nbsp;STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. GLENFORD YOUNG</a>&nbsp;(Parish of St. Tammany)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1620.CC.action.pdf">2021-CC-01620&nbsp;NICOLE VINCENT, ET AL. VS. D. R. HORTON, INC. - GULF COAST, ET AL.</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Lafayette)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1627.CC.action.pdf">2021-CC-01627&nbsp;LOUIE N. COLE VS. THE ESTATE OF JODY G. LASALLE AND/OR UNOPENED SUCCESSION OF JODY G. LASALLE, THROUGH ITS DULY AUTHORIZED SUCCESSION REPRESENTATIVE; CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY; ARIANA SKY SMITH; AND THE STATE OF LOUISIANA, THROUGH THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT</a>&nbsp;(Parish of St. Tammany)<br />Crichton, J., would grant and docket.<br />Crain, J., would grant and docket.<br />McCallum, J., would grant and docket.</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1629.C.action.pdf">2021-C-01629&nbsp;JAMESTOWN FORESTLAND, LLC VS. ROBBIE LEE SETLIFF, ET AL.</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Rapides)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1631.CC.action.pdf">2021-CC-01631&nbsp;LAW INDUSTRIES, LLC VS. STATE OF LOUISIANA, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, RECOVERY SCHOOL DISTRICT AND ADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING, INC.</a>&nbsp;(Parish of East Baton Rouge)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1635.C.action.pdf">2021-C-01635&nbsp;A.B.S. SERVICES, INC. VS. JAMES CONSTRUCTION GROUP, L.L.C. &amp; THE CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY</a>&nbsp;(Parish of East Baton Rouge)<br />Crain, J., recused in case number 2021-C-01635 only.</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1636.K.action.pdf">2021-K-01636&nbsp;STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. BRYNTON KELLI SIMMONS</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Webster)<br />Hughes, J., would grant.</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1637.C.action.pdf">2021-C-01637&nbsp;BRANDON WADE HIRSTIUS VS. CLECO CORPORATION, BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, L.L.C., CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, L.L.C</a>&nbsp;(Parish of St. Tammany)<br />Hughes, J., would grant.</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1639.CC.action.pdf">2021-CC-01639&nbsp;IN THE MATTER OF: RICHARD A. MARKSBURY, PH.D VS. LOUISIANA STATE BOARD OF EXAMINERS OF PSYCHOLOGISTS</a>&nbsp;(Parish of East Baton Rouge)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1640.CJ.action.pdf">2021-CJ-01640&nbsp;STATE OF LOUISIANA IN THE INTEREST OF I.M., JR.</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Orleans Civil)<br /><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1640.CJ.sjc.grant.pdf">Crichton, J., would grant and assigns reasons.</a><br />Crain, J., would grant.<br />McCallum, J., would grant.</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1642.KK.action.pdf">2021-KK-01642&nbsp;STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. JEREMY WILSON</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Washington)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1663.CC.action.pdf">2021-CC-01663&nbsp;TERREBONNE PARISH CONSOLIDATED GOVERNMENT VS. TRAPP CADILLAC CHEVROLET, INC.</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Terrebonne)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1665.C.action.pdf">2021-C-01665&nbsp;KIERA CRAWFORD, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF SANIYA CRAWFORD AND MALCOLM CRAWFORD VS. SHELTER GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY AND MATTHEW LABEE</a>&nbsp;(Parish of East Baton Rouge)<br />Hughes, J., would grant.<br /><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1665.C.jtg.grant.pdf">Genovese, J., would grant and assigns reasons.</a><br />Griffin, J., would grant for reasons assigned by Justice Genovese.</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1671.CC.action.pdf">2021-CC-01671&nbsp;ZANZABAR COSSE VS. LAFARGE NORTH AMERICA, INC.; LAFARGE AGGREGATES SOUTHEAST, INC.; CAJUN INDUSTRIES, LLC; CAJUN CONSTRUCTORS, LLC; JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.; AND MONSANTO COMPANY</a>&nbsp;(Parish of East Baton Rouge)<br /><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1671.CC.sjc.grant.pdf">Crichton, J., would grant and assigns reasons.</a><br />McCallum, J., would grant.</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1672.CC.action.pdf">2021-CC-01672&nbsp;ZANZABAR COSSE VS. LAFARGE NORTH AMERICA, INC.; LAFARGE AGGREGATES SOUTHEAST, INC.; CAJUN INDUSTRIES, LLC; CAJUN CONSTRUCTORS, LLC; JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.; AND MONSANTO COMPANY</a>&nbsp;(Parish of East Baton Rouge)<br /><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1672.CC.sjc.grant.pdf">Crichton, J., would grant and assigns reasons.</a><br />McCallum, J., would grant.</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1673.C.action.pdf">2021-C-01673&nbsp;STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. JUNIUS ROBILLARD</a>&nbsp;(Parish of East Feliciana)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1686.C.action.pdf">2021-C-01686&nbsp;DOUCET SERVICES, LLC VS. CORAN ALBERT, ET AL.</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Lafayette)<br />Hughes, J., would grant.</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1692.KK.action.pdf">2021-KK-01692&nbsp;STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. KIM POWELL</a>&nbsp;(Parish of East Baton Rouge)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1710.KO.action.pdf">2021-KO-01710&nbsp;STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. TRABILLION HAWTHORNE</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Caddo)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1712.C.action.pdf">2021-C-01712&nbsp;VICTORIA BASSETT VS. WALKER POLICE DEPARTMENT THROUGH THE CITY OF WALKER; LOUISIANA MUNICIPAL RISK MANAGEMENT AGENCY GROUP SELF-INSURANCE FUND; AND WESLEY CLARKSON C/W STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY VS. WESLEY CLARKSON, CITY OF WALKER AND LOUISIANA MUNICIPAL RISK MANAGEMENT AGENCY GROUP SELF-INSURANCE FUND</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Livingston)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1714.KK.action.pdf">2021-KK-01714&nbsp;STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. DEWAYNE WILLIE WATKINS</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Caddo)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1725.C.action.pdf">2021-C-01725&nbsp;JEFFERSON PARISH SCHOOL BOARD VS. TIMBRIAN, LLC</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Jefferson)<br />Hughes, J., would grant.</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1784.CJ.action.pdf">2021-CJ-01784&nbsp;STATE OF LOUISIANA IN THE INTEREST OF Z.D.</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Lafayette)</p><p>&nbsp;</p></div></div>
                </div>

</div>