<div><table cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" style="text-align:justify;" width="100%"><tbody><tr valign="top"><td valign="top" width="63%">FOR IMMEDIATE NEWS RELEASE</td><td valign="top" width="37%"><div align="right">NEWS RELEASE #010</div></td></tr><tr valign="top"><td valign="top">FROM: CLERK OF SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA</td><td valign="top"> </td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><div class="nrbody"><style>.nrbody h1 { display:block; font-size:1em; font-weight:bold; text-decoration:underline; } .nrbody p { text-align:justify; } .nrdate { font-weight:bold; text-decoration:underline; } </style><p> </p><p>On the <span class="nrdate">2nd day of March, 2022</span> the following action was taken by the Supreme Court of Louisiana in the case(s) listed below:</p><h1>Writ application granted. See briefing notice and Order:</h1><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-0064.K.action.pdf">2022-K-00064 STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. RONALD GASSER</a> (Parish of Jefferson)</p><h1>Joint petition for conditional admission granted. See per curiam:</h1><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-0120.BA.PC.pdf">2022-BA-00120 IN RE: COMMITTEE ON BAR ADMISSIONS CFN 140268</a></p><h1>Joint petition for consent discipline rejected. See order:</h1><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1633.B.PC.pdf">2021-B-01633 IN RE: CONFIDENTIAL PARTY</a><br />Griffin, J., would accept the joint petition for consent discipline.</p><h1>Remanded to the Office of Disciplinary Counsel for further investigation. See order:</h1><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1750.OB.PC.pdf">2021-OB-01750 IN RE: APPEAL OF THE DECISION OF THE DISCIPLINARY BOARD NO. 21-PDB-034</a><br /><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1750.OB.sjc.dis.pdf">Crichton, J., dissents and assigns reasons.</a><br />Crain, J., dissents.<br />McCallum, J., dissents.</p><h1>Motion for clarification granted. See Order:</h1><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-0280.O.PC.re.pdf">2022-O-00280 IN RE: JUSTICE OF THE PEACE DAVID D. WOMACK</a></p><h1>Writ application not considered - Petitioner has not demonstrated that he sought review in the court(s) below before filing in this Court nor shown the "extraordinary circumstances" that would justify bypassing that level of review. La.S.Ct.R. X § 5(b):</h1><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1920.CI.action.pdf">2021-CI-01920 STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. DAREMUS S. FILS</a></p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1934.KH.action.pdf">2021-KH-01934 STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. WINSTON DOSSMAN</a> (Parish of Avoyelles)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1941.KH.action.pdf">2021-KH-01941 DERLON K. CRAIN VS. STATE OF LOUISIANA</a></p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1959.CI.action.pdf">2021-CI-01959 JUNIUS LEE ROMAN, JR. VS. DRAPPER ANTHONY, LOYCE ANTHONY, TANGALA ROBERTSON, IBERIA MEDICAL HOSPITAL</a></p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1961.KH.action.pdf">2021-KH-01961 STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. BRYAN ALBERT KING</a> (Parish of St. Landry)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1968.KH.action.pdf">2021-KH-01968 STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. NOLAN C. TURNER, III</a></p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1971.KH.action.pdf">2021-KH-01971 STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. DANNIE LEE LEFLEUR</a></p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1973.CI.action.pdf">2021-CI-01973 STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. DONTA D. FRANCIS</a> (Parish of Pointe Coupee)<br />Hughes, J., recused in case number 2021-CI-01973 only.</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1974.KH.action.pdf">2021-KH-01974 STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. KENNETH G. GREEN AND DOMINIQUE GREEN</a> (Parish of West Baton Rouge)<br />Hughes, J., recused in case number 2021-KH-01974 only.</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1992.KH.action.pdf">2021-KH-01992 STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. DONALD WILLIAMS</a> (Parish of Orleans Criminal)</p><h1>Writ application not considered. Not timely filed. See Louisiana Supreme Court Rule X, § 5(a):</h1><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1754.KP.action.pdf">2021-KP-01754 STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. KENNETH SETH THOMAS</a> (Parish of Rapides)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1925.KH.action.pdf">2021-KH-01925 STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. STEVE BROWN</a> (Parish of Ouachita)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1933.KH.action.pdf">2021-KH-01933 STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. LONNIE KAHOE</a> (Parish of Orleans Criminal)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1946.KH.action.pdf">2021-KH-01946 STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. JULIUS W. HOLDEN</a> (Parish of St. Tammany)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1966.KH.action.pdf">2021-KH-01966 STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. DESMOND C. PARKER</a> (Parish of Orleans Criminal)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1969.KH.action.pdf">2021-KH-01969 STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. JONATHAN LEE BLACK</a> (Parish of Caddo)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1970.KH.action.pdf">2021-KH-01970 STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. SHANE HILL</a> (Parish of Plaquemines)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-0046.CC.action.pdf">2022-CC-00046 DAVID M. GANDY VS. ROBERT M. ZACARY AND STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY</a> (Parish of St. Tammany)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-0053.KH.action.pdf">2022-KH-00053 GLENN ROGERS VS. STATE OF LOUISIANA</a> (Parish of Jefferson)</p><h1>Writ application denied. See per curiam:</h1><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1824.KH.PC.pdf">2021-KH-01824 STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. AARON KITZLER</a> (Parish of Washington)<br />Hughes, J., would grant and order evidentiary hearing.<br />Griffin, J., would grant.</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1944.KH.PC.pdf">2021-KH-01944 MARK CROCKLEN VS. TIM HOOPER, WARDEN ELAYN HUNT CORRECTIONAL</a> (Parish of Jefferson)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1981.KH.PC.pdf">2021-KH-01981 STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. CLARION BAY, JR.</a> (Parish of Sabine)<br />Hughes, J., would deny on the showing made.</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-0009.KP.PC.pdf">2022-KP-00009 STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. EARL RAY JOHNSON, JR.</a> (Parish of Livingston)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-0036.KP.PC.pdf">2022-KP-00036 STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. CHARLES ANTHONY SMITH</a> (Parish of Livingston)</p><h1>Writ application denied:</h1><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1856.CC.action.pdf">2021-CC-01856 IN RE: THE MEDICAL REVIEW PROCEEDING OF JEFFERY BONURA</a> (Parish of Lafayette)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1915.CC.action.pdf">2021-CC-01915 IN RE: THE MEDICAL REVIEW PANEL PROCEEDING OF JEFFERY BONURA</a> (Parish of Lafayette)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1922.KO.action.pdf">2021-KO-01922 STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. JERRY LAVELLE VINCE</a> (Parish of St. Tammany)<br />Hughes, J., would grant in part.</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1942.KH.action.pdf">2021-KH-01942 STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. KERRY BERTRAND</a> (Parish of Acadia)<br />Hughes, J., would grant.</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1965.KH.action.pdf">2021-KH-01965 STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. TERRY FLANAGAN</a> (Parish of Bienville)<br />Griffin, J., would grant.</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-0026.KK.action.pdf">2022-KK-00026 STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. TRASHONE MAYES</a> (Parish of Concordia)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-0027.CC.action.pdf">2022-CC-00027 COREY TREAS VS. CHANTAL ELIZABETH KOERNER</a> (Parish of Orleans Civil)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-0034.C.action.pdf">2022-C-00034 SUCCESSION OF ERIC KYLE MECHE</a> (Parish of Orleans Civil)<br /><a href="/opinions/2022/22-0034.C.jbm.con.pdf">McCallum, J., concurs and assigns reasons.</a></p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-0035.OC.action.pdf">2022-OC-00035 STANLEY JORDAN VS. JOHN H. GIBSON AND CITY HALL CODE ENFORCEMENT</a> (Parish of Orleans Civil)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-0038.C.action.pdf">2022-C-00038 MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC VS. JASON STACK</a> (Parish of Ascension)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-0044.C.action.pdf">2022-C-00044 AMANDA L. LANDRY VS. ANTHONY KYLE LANDRY</a> (Parish of East Feliciana)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-0047.CC.action.pdf">2022-CC-00047 CHERYL AND BILLY CATO VS. SPS SERVICES, LLC D/B/A PREMIER POOLS & SPA</a> (Parish of Jefferson)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-0048.CC.action.pdf">2022-CC-00048 DARLENE WARD PELLECER, ET AL. VS. WERNER CO., WERNER CO. (DE), ET AL.</a> (Parish of Orleans Civil)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-0049.C.action.pdf">2022-C-00049 NORETTA PHILLIPS VS. LOUISIANA STADIUM AND EXPOSITION DISTRICT, BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS / GAYLE M. BENSON</a> (Parish of Orleans Civil)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-0050.C.action.pdf">2022-C-00050 JANIE BEAVERS, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF MINORS, KYNNEDY BEAVERS, KAMBRIE BEAVERS, AND TRISTAN BEAVERS VS. THE HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY AND ANDRE M. LEDET</a> (Parish of East Baton Rouge)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-0058.C.action.pdf">2022-C-00058 STEPHANIE NICOLE DISATELL VS. LANCE D. SMITH</a> (Parish of Rapides)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-0123.KP.action.pdf">2022-KP-00123 STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. TERRY JONES</a> (Parish of Orleans Criminal)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-0141.KK.action.pdf">2022-KK-00141 STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. TROY JORDAN</a> (Parish of St. Bernard)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-0170.CJ.action.pdf">2022-CJ-00170 STATE OF LOUISIANA IN THE INTEREST OF T.L.</a> (Parish of Washington)<br /><a href="/opinions/2022/22-0170.CJ.jdh.con.pdf">Hughes, J., concurs and assigns reasons.</a></p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-0296.CC.action.pdf">2022-CC-00296 MORGAN CITY LAND AND FUR COMPANY, L.L.C. VS. TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY, L.L.C., ET AL.</a> (Parish of Plaquemines)</p><p> </p></div></div>