December 9, 2022 - Opinions - Louisiana Supreme Court

<div>
                         <div class="content">
                             <div class="bcrumb">
                                 <ol class="row breadcrumb offprint">
                                     <li><a href="/">Home</a></li>
                                             <li><a href="CourtActions/2022">Court Actions</a></li>

<li class="active">
December 9, 2022 
                                             </li>

</ol>

</div>
                         </div>

<div id="mainbodycontent" class="col col-md-12 mainbodycontent" style="margin-top:-10px;">                    
<table cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" style="text-align:justify;" width="100%"><tbody><tr valign="top" style=""><td valign="top" width="63%">FOR IMMEDIATE NEWS RELEASE</td><td valign="top" width="37%"><div align="right">NEWS RELEASE #053</div></td></tr><tr valign="top"><td valign="top">FROM: CLERK OF SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA</td><td valign="top">&nbsp;</td></tr></tbody></table><p>&nbsp;</p><div class="nrbody"><p><style>.nrbody h1 { display:block; font-size:1em; font-weight:bold; text-decoration:underline; } .nrbody p { text-align:justify; } .nrdate { font-weight:bold; text-decoration:underline; } </style></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>The Opinions handed down on the <span class="nrdate">9th day of December, 2022</span> are as follows:</p><h1>BY Hughes, J.:</h1><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-0263.C.OPN.pdf">2022-C-00263&nbsp;SUCCESSION OF WILLIE CLYDE BURNS</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Claiborne)<br />REVERSED AND REMANDED. SEE OPINION.</p><p>Weimer, C.J., additionally concurs and assigns reasons.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-0425.C.OPN.pdf">2022-C-00425&nbsp;NAR SOLUTIONS, INC. VS. BRYAN K. KUHN</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Jefferson)<br />REVERSED. DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT REINSTATED. SEE OPINION.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><h1>BY Crichton, J.:</h1><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-1068.CC.OPN.pdf">2022-CC-01068&nbsp;WALTER GEORGE AND JANIE GEORGE VS. PROGRESSIVE WASTE SOLUTIONS OF LA, INC. AND ABC INSURANCE COMPANY</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Terrebonne)<br />REVERSED AND REMANDED. SEE OPINION.</p><p>Crain, J., concurs and assigns reasons.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><h1>BY Genovese, J.:</h1><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-0206.K.OPN.pdf">2022-K-00206&nbsp;STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. QWANDARIOUS ROWE</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Washington)<br />REVERSED. SEE OPINION.</p><p>Crain, J., dissents and assigns reasons.<br />McCallum, J., dissents for the reasons assigned by Crain, J.<br /></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><h1>BY Crain, J.:</h1><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-0596.CC.OPN.pdf">2022-CC-00596&nbsp;DANIEL J. SALOOM, ET AL. VS. STATE OF LOUISIANA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Lafayette)<br />JUDGMENT VACATED AND CASE REMANDED. SEE OPINION.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><h1>BY McCallum, J.:</h1><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-0100.C.cw.22-0113.C.OPN.pdf">2022-C-00100 c/w 2022-C-00113&nbsp;GEORGE RAYMOND WILLIAMS, M.D., ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, A PROFESSIONAL MEDICAL LLC, ET AL. VS. BESTCOMP, INC., ET AL.</a>&nbsp;(Parish of St. Landry)<br />REVERSED; VACATED; AND CASE DISMISSED. SEE OPINION.</p><p>Retired Judge Jimmie Peters assigned Justice ad hoc, sitting for Genovese, J., recused.&nbsp;</p><p>Hughes, J., concurs in part and dissents in part and assigns reasons.<br />Griffin, J., concurs in part and dissents in part for the reasons assigned by Hughes, J.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><h1>BY Griffin, J.:</h1><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1554.C.OPN.pdf">2021-C-01554&nbsp;BERKLEY ASSURANCE COMPANY VS. MELISSA WILLIS, AS PARENT/GUARDIAN OF MACY LEE WILLIS, ET AL. C/W BERKLEY ASSURANCE COMPANY VS. MELISSA WILLIS, AS PARENT/GUARDIAN OF MACY LEE WILLIS, ET AL.</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Orleans Civil)<br />AFFIRMED. SEE OPINION.</p><p>Weimer, C.J., dissents and assigns reasons.<br />Crichton, J., additionally concurs and assigns reasons.<br />Crain, J., dissents and assigns reasons.<br />McCallum, J., dissents.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><h1>PER CURIAM:</h1><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-0783.B.OPN.pdf">2022-B-00783&nbsp;IN RE: RICHMOND C. ODOM</a><br />DISCIPLINE IMPOSED. SEE PER CURIAM.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-0954.B.OPN.pdf">2022-B-00954&nbsp;IN RE: RICHARD L. ROOT</a><br />DISCIPLINE IMPOSED. SEE PER CURIAM.</p><p>Weimer, C.J., dissents and assigns reasons.<br />Hughes, J., dissents for the reasons assigned by Weimer, C.J.<br />Griffin, J., dissents for the reasons assigned by Weimer, C.J.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p></div>
                </div>

</div>