<div><table cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" style="text-align:justify;" width="100%"><tbody><tr valign="top"><td valign="top" width="63%">FOR IMMEDIATE NEWS RELEASE</td><td valign="top" width="37%"><div align="right">NEWS RELEASE #004</div></td></tr><tr valign="top"><td valign="top">FROM: CLERK OF SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA</td><td valign="top"> </td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><div class="nrbody"><style>.nrbody h1 { display:block; font-size:1em; font-weight:bold; text-decoration:underline; } .nrbody p { text-align:justify;}.nrdate { font-weight:bold;text-decoration:underline;} </style><p> </p><p>The Opinions handed down on the <span class="nrdate">6th day of February, 2025</span> are as follows:</p><p> </p><h1>BY Hughes, J.:</h1><p><a href="/opinions/2025/24-0897.K.OPN.pdf">2024-K-00897 STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. DEON RAY BARTIE</a> (Parish of Allen)<br />AFFIRMED. SEE OPINION.</p><p>Weimer, C.J., dissents and assigns reasons.<br />Hughes, J., additionally concurs and assigns reasons.<br />Crain, J., dissents and assigns reasons.<br />McCallum, J., dissents and assigns reasons.<br />Guidry, J., concurs in the result.<br /></p><p> </p><p> </p><h1>BY Crain, J.:</h1><p><a href="/opinions/2025/24-0627.C.OPN.pdf">2024-C-00627 HUNTSMAN INTERNATIONAL, L.L.C. AND RUBICON, L.L.C. VS. PRAXAIR, INC.</a> (Parish of Orleans Civil)<br />AMENDED IN PART. SEE OPINION.</p><p>Hughes, J., dissents for the reasons assigned by Knoll, J. <br />Knoll, J., dissents and assigns reasons.<br />Griffin, J., dissents for the reasons assigned by Knoll, J.<br /></p><p> </p><p> </p><h1>BY Griffin, J.:</h1><p><a href="/opinions/2025/24-0406.C.OPN.pdf">2024-C-00406 PINNACLE CONSTRUCTION GROUP, L.L.C. VS. DEVERE SWEPCO JV, L.L.C., LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY AND UNITY VILLAGE HOMES, L.L.C.</a> (Parish of St. Landry)<br />REVERSED AND REMANDED. SEE OPINION.</p><p>Hughes, J., additionally concurs for the reasons assigned by Crain, J. <br />Crain, J., concurs and assigns reasons.<br />McCallum, J., concurs in the result.<br />Guidry, J., concurs in the result.<br /></p><p> </p><p> </p><h1>PER CURIAM:</h1><p><a href="/opinions/2025/24-0564.KK.OPN.pdf">2024-KK-00564 STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. FELTON THOMPSON</a> (Parish of Jefferson)<br />REVERSED AND REMANDED. SEE PER CURIAM.</p><p>Griffin, J., additionally concurs and assigns reasons.<br /></p><p> </p><p> </p></div></div>