|
FOR IMMEDIATE NEWS RELEASE
NEWS RELEASE
# 069
FROM: CLERK OF
SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
On the 17th
day of June, 1996 , the following action
was taken by the Supreme Court of Louisiana in the case(s)
listed below:
WRITS
DENIED :
96-KK- 1438 STATE
OF LOUISIANA v. DONALD RAY WRIGHT (Parish of East Baton
Rouge)
CALOGERO, C.J.
- would grant the writ.
VICTORY, J. -
not on panel.
96-KK- 1465 STATE
OF LOUISIANA v. DANNY CAUSEY (Parish of Orleans)
KIMBALL, J. -
not on panel.
On the 18th
day of June, 1996 , the following action
was taken by the Supreme Court of Louisiana in the case(s)
listed below:
WRIT
GRANTED WITH ORDER :
96-KK- 1435 STATE
OF LOUISIANA v. GUS MIJALIS, ET AL (Parish of East Baton
Rouge)
CALOGERO, C.J.
- concurs in part; dissents in part. I would grant the
State relief insofar as not requiring the State to "outline"
or "list" the evidence in its possession that it intends
to use at trial. However, I would leave in effect the
district court's judgment insofar as it requires the
State to identify, out of the 22 boxes of documents,
those documents that the State intends to use at trial
and allow the defendant to reproduce these documents
at his expense, if he chooses. The district court in
this respect has not abused its discretion and its ruling,
in this respect, was not erroneous. La. C.Cr.P. art.
718 surely does not answer the question posed in this
case, and the resolution that the judge made here is
correct. Requiring the State, which has seized 22 boxes
of documents that belong to defendant, to simply tell
defendant in advance of trial what among those boxes
it intends to use is not unjust. Therefore, this Court
should not upset the trial judge's ruling in this respect,
which is fundamentally fair.
WATSON, J. -
not on panel.
JOHNSON, J. -
would deny the writ.
|