FOR
IMMEDIATE NEWS RELEASE
NEWS RELEASE
# 35
FROM : CLERK
OF SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
The Opinions
handed down on the 16th day of May, 2000
, are as follows:
BY
MARCUS, J. :
1999-CA-
2854 ALCEE PIERCE v. LAFOURCHE PARISH COUNCIL (Parish
of Lafourche)
For the reasons
assigned, the judgment of the court of appeal declaring
that portion of La. R.S. 23:1221 (3) (d) (iii) which
states "begins to receive old age insurance benefits
under Title II of the Social Security Act, whichever
comes first" unconstitutional is affirmed. The judgment
of the court of appeal declaring the remainder of La.
R.S. 23:1221 (3) (d) (iii) unconstitutional is reversed.
The case is remanded to the district court for further
proceedings. Costs are assessed against defendants.
LEMMON, J., not
on panel. Rule IV, Part 2, §3.
BY
LEMMON, J. :
1999-KA-
2329 STATE OF LOUISIANA v. JOSEPH DAVIS FERRIS
(Parish of Evangeline) (Underage Driving Under the Influence)
For these reasons,
the judgment of the trial court is reversed, and the
defendant's motion to quash is overruled. The case is
remanded to the district court for further proceedings.
KIMBALL, J.,
not on panel. Rule IV, Part 2, §3.
MARCUS,
J., dissents and assigns reasons.
BY
KIMBALL, J. :
1999-KK-
1750 STATE OF LOUISIANA v. JERRY JEROME HILLS (Parish
of Tangipahoa) (First Degree Murder)
For the reasons
stated herein, the decisions of the trial court and
court of appeal admitting the other crimes evidence
against defendant are reversed and the matter is remanded
to the trial court for further proceedings consistent
with this opinion.
REVERSED AND
REMANDED.
CALOGERO, C.J.,
not on panel; recused. See Rule IV, Part 2, §3.
BY
JOHNSON, J. :
1999-KA-
2291 STATE OF LOUISIANA v. CHRISTINE D. BRENAN
(Parish of St. Tammany) (Promotion of Obscene Devices,
Two Counts)
We find that
La. R.S.§14:106.1, which bans the promotion of
obscene devices, bears no rational relationship to a
legitimate state interest and is, therefore, violative
of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment
to the United States Constitution. The ruling of the
Court of Appeal is affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
KNOLL, J., not
on panel. Rule IV, Part 2, §3.
LEMMON, J., concurs
and will assign reasons.
KIMBALL, J.,
concurs in result.
VICTORY, J.,
concurs in result.
TRAYLOR,
J., dissents and assigns reasons.
1999-C-
2570 BEN GUITREAU v. ANDREW KUCHARCHUK, M.D. (Parish
of E. Baton Rouge) We hold that when the ninety-day
period of suspension after the decision of the medical
review panel is completed, plaintiffs in medical malpractice
actions are entitled to the period of time that remains
unused at the time the request for a medical review
panel is filed. We also hold that the court of appeal
did not err in finding that prescription commenced on
November 23, 1992 and that plaintiff's action had not
prescribed. Accordingly, we affirm the court of appeal's
decision and remand this matter to the trial court.
AFFIRMED AND
REMANDED.
VICTORY, J.,
not on panel. See Rule IV, Part 2, §3.
MARCUS,
J., dissents and assigns reasons.
LEMMON,
J., concurs and assigns reasons .
TRAYLOR, J.,
dissents for reasons assigned by Marcus, J.
BY
VICTORY, J.:
1999-KK-
1528 STATE OF LOUISIANA v. FERNANDO GUZMAN (Parish
of Caddo)
CONSOLIDATED
WITH:
1999-K - 1753
STATE OF LOUISIANA V. JERRY LYNN STILES (Parish of Bossier)
For the reasons
stated herein, in State v. Guzman , we reverse the judgment
of the court of appeal granting defendant's motion to
quash, reinstate the judgment of the trial court denying
defendant's motion to quash, and remand the case to
the trial court for further proceedings. In State v.
Stiles , we affirm the judgment of the court of appeal
affirming defendant's convictions and sentences.
STATE OF LOUISIANA
V. GUZMAN, NO. 99-KK-1528:
REVERSED AND
REMANDED.
STATE OF LOUISIANA
V. STILES, NO. 99-K-1753:
AFFIRMED.
JOHNSON, J.,
not on panel. Rule IV, Part 2, §3.
CALOGERO,
C.J., concurs in part, dissents in part and assigns
reasons.
LEMMON, J., concurs
and will assign reasons.
KIMBALL, J.,
concurs in part and dissents in part for reasons assigned
by Calogero, C.J.
BY
KNOLL, J. :
1999-C-
3264 MICHAEL TIMMONS AND WANDA TIMMONS v. STACIE MICHELLE
SILMAN AND STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY AND
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTO INSURANCE (Parish of Ouachita)
For the foregoing
reasons, the judgments of the lower courts, finding
State Farm Fire and Casualty Insurance not liable to
Michael and Wanda Timmons for the injuries arising out
of a motor vehicle accident between Michael Timmons
and Stacie Silman are affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
MARCUS, J., not
on panel. See La. S.Ct. R. IV, Part 2, §3.
CALOGERO,
C.J., dissents and assigns reasons.
LEMMON,
J., dissents and assigns reasons.
JOHNSON,
J., dissents and assigns reasons .
PER
CURIAM :
1999-CA-
2007 TAMMY LANGLOIS IN HER OWN RIGHT AND ON BEHALF OF
THE MINOR KRYSTAL MARTIN v. EAST BATON ROUGE PARISH
SCHOOL BOARD AND NITA K. BRAUD (Parish of E. Baton
Rouge)
For the reasons
assigned, the judgment of the district court declaring
La. R.S. 13:5107(D) unconstitutional is vacated and
set aside. The case is remanded to the district court
for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.
VICTORY, J.,
not on panel. Rule IV, Part II, §3.
1999-B-
3549 IN RE: DONALD L. MAYEUX
(Disciplinary
Proceedings)
Upon review of
the findings and recommendation of the hearing committee
and the disciplinary board, and considering the record,
briefs, and oral argument, it is ordered that Donald
L. Mayeaux be publicly reprimanded. All costs and expenses
in this matter are assessed against respondent in accordance
with Supreme Court Rule XIX, §10.1, with legal
interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality
of this court's judgment until paid.
KIMBALL, J.,
not on panel. Rule IV, Part II, §3.
VICTORY,
J., dissents and assigns reasons .
TRAYLOR, J.,
dissents for reasons assigned by Victory, J.
KNOLL,
J., dissents and assigns reasons. |