|
FOR IMMEDIATE NEWS
RELEASE
NEWS RELEASE # 39
FROM: CLERK OF SUPREME
COURT OF LOUISIANA
The Opinions handed
down on the 24th day of May, 2005,
are as follows:
BY VICTORY,
J.:
2004-C-
2254 GREGORY M. TAYLOR v. TOMMIE'S
GAMING AND BRIDGEFIELD INSURANCE COMPANY (Office Of Workers'
Compensation District 1-W)
For the reasons expressed
herein, the judgments of the lower courts are reversed. The
matter is remanded to the OWC for plaintiff to present any
remaining witnesses or other evidence and to conclude his
case, then for the remaining parties to present such evidence
as they choose.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
CALOGERO, C.J., assigns additional concurring reasons.
PER CURIAM:
2004-B-
2395 IN RE: NORMAN MOPSIK
(Disciplinary Proceedings)
Upon review of the
findings and recommendation of the hearing committee and the
disciplinary board, and considering the record, briefs, and
oral argument, it is ordered that Norman Mopsik, Louisiana
Bar Roll number 9665, be and he hereby is suspended from the
practice of law for a period of sixty days. All costs and
expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in
accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, §10.1, with legal
interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality
of this court's judgment until paid.
KIMBALL, J., concurs in part and dissents in part and assigns
reasons.
TRAYLOR, J., concurs
in part and dissents in part for reasons assigned by Kimball,
J.
2004-B-
2758 IN RE: FRITZ M. STOLLER
(Disciplinary Proceedings)
Upon review of the
findings and recommendations of the hearing committee and
disciplinary board, and considering the record, briefs, and
oral argument, it is ordered that the name of Fritz M. Stoller,
also known as Frederick M. Stoller, Louisiana Bar Roll number
12495, be stricken from the roll of attorneys and that his
license to practice law in the State of Louisiana be revoked.
Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, Section 24(A), it is further
ordered that respondent be permanently prohibited from being
readmitted to the practice of law in this state. All costs
and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent
in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, §10.1, with
legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality
of this court's judgment until paid.
CALOGERO, C.J., dissents
for reasons assigned by Weimer, J.
WEIMER, J., dissents
from the sanction of permanent disbarment and would impose
the sanction of disbarment and assigns reason
|
