<div><table cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" style="text-align:justify;" width="100%"><tbody><tr valign="top"><td valign="top" width="63%">FOR IMMEDIATE NEWS RELEASE</td><td valign="top" width="37%"><div align="right">NEWS RELEASE #004</div></td></tr><tr valign="top"><td valign="top">FROM: CLERK OF SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA</td><td valign="top"> </td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><div class="nrbody"><style>.nrbody h1 { display:block; font-size:1em; font-weight:bold; text-decoration:underline; } .nrbody p { text-align:justify; } .nrdate { font-weight:bold; text-decoration:underline; } </style><p> </p><p>On the <span class="nrdate">26th day of January, 2022</span> the following action was taken by the Supreme Court of Louisiana in the case(s) listed below:</p><h1>Conditional admission granted. See per curiam:</h1><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-0871.BA.PC.pdf">2021-BA-00871 IN RE: COMMITTEE ON BAR ADMISSIONS CFN-815147</a></p><h1>Joint petition for interim suspension granted. See order:</h1><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-0105.B.PC.pdf">2022-B-00105 IN RE: C. KEVIN HAYES</a></p><h1>Petition for permanent resignation from the practice of law in lieu of discipline granted. See order:</h1><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1783.OB.PC.pdf">2021-OB-01783 IN RE: JOHN DAVID ALLEN</a></p><h1>Petition to sit for the Louisiana the bar exam granted. See order:</h1><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-0082.BA.PC.pdf">2022-BA-00082 IN RE: COMMITTEE ON BAR ADMISSIONS CFN-65372</a></p><h1>Joint petition for consent discipline accepted. See per curiam:</h1><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1727.B.PC.pdf">2021-B-01727 IN RE: SIMEON C. SMITH, IV</a></p><h1>Permanent disbarment imposed. See per curiam:</h1><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1579.B.PC.pdf">2021-B-01579 IN RE: GRETA L. WILSON</a><br /><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1579.B.sjc.con.pdf">Crichton, J., additionally concurs and assigns reasons.</a><br />Genovese, J., dissents and would impose regular disbarment.<br />Crain, J., dissents and would impose regular disbarment.</p><h1>Reciprocal discipline imposed. See per curiam:</h1><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1580.B.PC.pdf">2021-B-01580 IN RE: LYNN PLAISANCE JOHNSON</a></p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1638.B.PC.pdf">2021-B-01638 IN RE: RICHARD L. REYNOLDS</a></p><h1>Suspension imposed. See per curiam:</h1><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1558.B.PC.pdf">2021-B-01558 IN RE: MYLES JULIAN JOHNSON</a></p><h1>Writ application not considered. Not timely filed. See Louisiana Supreme Court Rule X, § 5(a):</h1><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1494.KH.action.pdf">2021-KH-01494 STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. SCOTT E. HOUSTON</a> (Parish of Caddo)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1501.KH.action.pdf">2021-KH-01501 STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. JAMES BOYD COLEMAN</a> (Parish of Lincoln)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1602.KP.action.pdf">2021-KP-01602 STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. JAMES ANTHONY BELL</a> (Parish of Lincoln)<br />McCallum, J., recused in case number 2021-KP-01602 only.</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1659.KH.action.pdf">2021-KH-01659 STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. ASHRAF KHALIL</a> (Parish of Terrebonne)<br />Weimer, C. J., recused in case number 2021-KH-01659 only.</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1669.KH.action.pdf">2021-KH-01669 STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. AARON LEE CONNER</a> (Parish of Caddo)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1739.C.action.pdf">2021-C-01739 FORD MOTOR CREDIT COMPANY, LLC VS. OLETHIA DAVIS</a> (Parish of St. John the Baptist)</p><h1>Writ application not considered. Petitioner has not demonstrated that he sought review in the court(s) below before filing in this Court nor shown the "extraordinary circumstances" that would justify bypassing that level of review. La.S.Ct.R. X § 5(a):</h1><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1536.KH.action.pdf">2021-KH-01536 STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. BOBBY PORTER</a> (Parish of Sabine)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1537.KH.action.pdf">2021-KH-01537 STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. HERBERT POLLARD, JR.</a> (Parish of Rapides)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1568.KH.action.pdf">2021-KH-01568 STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. CEDRIC EMERSON</a> (Parish of Ascension)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1668.CI.action.pdf">2021-CI-01668 DANNIE LEE LAFLEUR VS. LOUISIANA PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONS</a></p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1705.KH.action.pdf">2021-KH-01705 STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. ASHTON BIGGS</a> (Parish of Rapides)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1706.KH.action.pdf">2021-KH-01706 STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. DASHONE REYNOLDS</a> (Parish of Orleans Criminal)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1709.KH.action.pdf">2021-KH-01709 STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. BRUCE BROWN</a> (Parish of Orleans Criminal)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1715.KH.action.pdf">2021-KH-01715 STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. AARON HARRELL</a> (Parish of Jefferson)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1767.KH.action.pdf">2021-KH-01767 STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. DANNON K. SELLERS</a><br />Genovese, J., recused in case number 2021-KH-01767 only.</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1797.KH.action.pdf">2021-KH-01797 STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. MARKISS BUCKLEY</a></p><h1>Application for rehearing denied:</h1><p><a href="/opinions/2022/18-1706.CC.action.re.pdf">2018-CC-01706 TURBINE GENERATION SERVICES, LLC, ET AL. VS. GE OIL & GAS, INC., ET AL. C/W TURBINE POWERED TECHNOLOGY, LLC, ET AL. VS. GE OIL & GAS, INC., ET AL.</a> (Parish of Lafayette)<br />Weimer, C.J., would grant.<br />Hughes, J., would grant.<br />Griffin, J., would grant.</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-0808.C.action.re.pdf">2021-C-00808 JARED GUIDRY AND LEIGHA WOODS VS. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY</a> (Parish of Jefferson)<br />Weimer, C.J., would grant.</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-0995.C.action.re.pdf">2021-C-00995 ROBERT LAPOINT VS. COMMERCE & INDUSTRY INSURANCE COMPANY AND STEPHENS TPS, INC.</a> (Parish of Calcasieu)<br />Hughes, J., would grant.<br />Genovese, J., would grant.<br />Griffin, J., would grant.</p><h1>Writ application denied - Applicant has previously exhausted his right to state collateral review and fails to show that any exception permits his successive filing. See Robinson v. Vannoy, 2018-0538 (La. 4/22/19), 267 So.3d 1113:</h1><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1293.KH.action.pdf">2021-KH-01293 STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. TERRESZ ROBINSON</a> (Parish of Ouachita)</p><h1>Writ application denied - Applicant has previously exhausted his right to state collateral review. See State ex rel. Dickerson v. State, 2016-1076 (La. 9/29/17), 227 So.3d 259.:</h1><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1452.KH.action.pdf">2021-KH-01452 STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. FARD A. R. DICKERSON</a> (Parish of Orleans Criminal)</p><h1>Writ application denied - Applicant has previously exhausted his right to state collateral review. See State v. Delaney, 2019-02060 (La. 8/14/20), 300 So.3d 833:</h1><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1574.KH.action.pdf">2021-KH-01574 STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. SAMUEL DELANEY</a> (Parish of Allen)<br />Genovese, J., recused in case number 2021-KH-01574 only.</p><h1>Writ application denied - Applicant has previously exhausted his right to state collateral review and he fails to show that any exception permits his successive filing. See State v. White, 18-0616 (La. 3/18/19), 265 So.3d 757:</h1><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1867.KH.action.pdf">2021-KH-01867 STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. ROBERT LATROY WHITE</a> (Parish of St. Tammany)<br />Weimer, C. J., recused in case number 2021-KH-01867 only.</p><h1>Writ application denied. See per curiam:</h1><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-0221.KP.PC.pdf">2021-KP-00221 MARK T. CAMBRE VS. BURL CAIN, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PRISON, ANGOLA, LOUISIANA</a> (Parish of Jefferson)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1086.KP.PC.pdf">2021-KP-01086 STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. BRITTANY TYSON</a> (Parish of Webster)<br /><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1086.KP.jlw.cipdip.pdf">Weimer, C.J., concurs in part and dissents in part and assigns reasons.</a><br />Hughes, J., would grant and docket.<br /><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1086.KP.pdg.grant.pdf">Griffin, J., would grant and docket and assigns reasons.</a></p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1263.KH.PC.pdf">2021-KH-01263 STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. OLLIE COLEMAN</a> (Parish of St. James)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1689.KH.PC.pdf">2021-KH-01689 STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. MAYSON JAMES JOHN</a> (Parish of Jefferson Davis)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1860.KH.PC.pdf">2021-KH-01860 STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. NATHANIEL WAYNE CARMOUCHE</a> (Parish of Rapides)</p><h1>Writ application denied:</h1><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1256.KH.action.pdf">2021-KH-01256 STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. RICHARD B. LAY</a> (Parish of St. Tammany)<br />Weimer, C. J., recused in case number 2021-KH-01256 only.<br />Griffin, J., would grant in part to consider the retroactivity of Ramos v. Louisiana, 140 S.Ct. 1390, 206 L.Ed.2d 583 (2020) under Louisiana law. See Edwards v. Vannoy, 141 S.Ct. 1547, 1559 n. 6 (2021).</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1468.KD.action.pdf">2021-KD-01468 STATE EX REL. ANTOINE TATE VS. TIM HOOPER, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY, ANGOLA, LOUISIANA</a> (Parish of East Baton Rouge)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1489.KH.action.pdf">2021-KH-01489 NATHAN PETTUS VS. TIM HOOPER, WARDEN</a> (Parish of Jefferson)<br />Crichton, J., would grant and docket.<br />Genovese, J., would grant and docket.<br />Griffin, J., would grant and docket.</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1550.KH.action.pdf">2021-KH-01550 STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. JOSHUA PAUL GALLOWAY</a> (Parish of Evangeline)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1664.KP.action.pdf">2021-KP-01664 STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. ALDOLPHUS WILSON</a> (Parish of Orleans Criminal)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1679.KO.action.pdf">2021-KO-01679 STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. MELINDA R. DUNGAN</a> (Parish of Franklin)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1740.C.action.pdf">2021-C-01740 DEMARCUS MOSS VS. HAROLD M. STOKES, MD, PONTCHARTRAIN ORTHOPEDICS & SPORTS MEDICINE, AND EAST JEFFERSON AMBULATORY SURGERY CENTER</a> (Parish of Jefferson)<br />Hughes, J., would grant.</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1768.CC.action.pdf">2021-CC-01768 LACEY L. NORMAND VS. STEPHEN E. GRAYSON, SHERI GRAYSON, U.S. AGENCIES INSURANCE COMPANY AND STATE OF LOUISIANA, THROUGH THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT</a> (Parish of St. Tammany)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1785.C.action.pdf">2021-C-01785 NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC VS. THE UNOPENED SUCCESSION OF MICHAEL FREDERICK KEHOE A/K/A MICHAEL FREDERICK KEHOE A/K/A MICHAEL K. FREDERICK A/K/A MICHAEL FREDERICK AND JUDY SAVELL KEHOE A/K/A JUDY S. KEHOE A/K/A JUDY KEHOE</a> (Parish of St. Tammany)<br />Hughes, J., recused in case number 2021-C-01785 only.</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1794.C.action.pdf">2021-C-01794 SEAN DAVID DUCKETT, SR. VS. JEFFERSON PARISH DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS - STREETS</a> (Parish of Jefferson)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1805.K.action.pdf">2021-K-01805 STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. TASHONTY C. TONEY</a> (Parish of Orleans Criminal)<br /><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1805.K.sjc.cip.pdf">Crichton, J., concurs in part, dissents in part and assigns reasons.</a><br />McCallum, J., concurs in part, dissents in part for the reasons assigned by Justice Crichton.</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1807.CC.action.pdf">2021-CC-01807 SUCCESSION OF DONNA LYNN SIMPSON TRIPP</a> (Parish of Claiborne)<br />Hughes, J., would grant.</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1808.C.action.pdf">2021-C-01808 JONATHAN L. WOODS VS. PREIS PLC</a> (Parish of Lafayette)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1812.CC.action.pdf">2021-CC-01812 RICHARD HAMPTON, ET AL. VS. CITY OF NEW ORLEANS</a> (Parish of Orleans Civil)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1815.CC.action.pdf">2021-CC-01815 DAVID BENTON AND ASHLIE DOWNEY VS. STATE OF LOUISIANA, THROUGH DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES AND THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT, ASHLEY SHIELDS, AND RONNIE R. ROUNDTREE</a> (Parish of Tangipahoa)<br />Hughes, J., would grant.</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1859.KH.action.pdf">2021-KH-01859 STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. LEVELLE TOLLIVER</a> (Parish of Ouachita)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1954.KH.action.pdf">2021-KH-01954 STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. RICHARD B. LAY</a> (Parish of St. Tammany)<br />Weimer, C. J., recused in case number 2021-KH-01954 only.<br />Griffin, J., would grant in part to consider the retroactivity of Ramos v. Louisiana, 140 S.Ct. 1390, 206 L.Ed.2d 583 (2020) under Louisiana law. See Edwards v. Vannoy, 141 S.Ct. 1547, 1559 n. 6 (2021).</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/21-1994.KH.action.pdf">2021-KH-01994 STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. RICHARD B. LAY</a> (Parish of St. Tammany)<br />Weimer, C. J., recused in case number 2021-KH-01994 only.<br />Griffin, J., would grant in part to consider the retroactivity of Ramos v. Louisiana, 140 S.Ct. 1390, 206 L.Ed.2d 583 (2020) under Louisiana law. See Edwards v. Vannoy, 141 S.Ct. 1547, 1559 n. 6 (2021).</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-0028.KK.action.pdf">2022-KK-00028 STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. FRANK ADAMS</a> (Parish of St. Tammany)</p><p> </p></div></div>