October 19, 26, 27, and November 1, 2022 - Actions

<div>
                         <div class="content">
                             <div class="bcrumb">
                                 <ol class="row breadcrumb offprint">
                                     <li><a href="/">Home</a></li>
                                             <li><a href="CourtActions/2022">Court Actions</a></li>

<li class="active">
October 19, 26, 27, and November 1, 2022 
                                             </li>

</ol>

</div>
                         </div>

<div id="mainbodycontent" class="col col-md-12 mainbodycontent" style="margin-top:-10px;">                    
<div><table cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" style="text-align:justify;" width="100%"><tbody><tr valign="top"><td valign="top" width="63%">FOR IMMEDIATE NEWS RELEASE</td><td valign="top" width="37%"><div align="right">NEWS RELEASE #047</div></td></tr><tr valign="top"><td valign="top">FROM: CLERK OF SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA</td><td valign="top">&nbsp;</td></tr></tbody></table><p>&nbsp;</p><div class="nrbody"><style>.nrbody h1 { display:block; font-size:1em; font-weight:bold; text-decoration:underline; } .nrbody p { text-align:justify; } .nrdate { font-weight:bold; text-decoration:underline; } </style><p>&nbsp;</p><p>On the <span class="nrdate">19th day of October, 2022</span> the following action was taken by the Supreme Court of Louisiana in the case(s) listed below:</p><h1>Relief denied. See order:</h1><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-1531.OB.PC.pdf">2022-OB-01531&nbsp;IN RE: APPEAL OF THE DECISION OF THE DISCIPLINARY BOARD NO. 21-DB-003</a></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>On the <span class="nrdate">26th day of October, 2022</span> the following action was taken by the Supreme Court of Louisiana in the case(s) listed below:</p><h1>Stay denied. Writ application denied:</h1><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-1542.CC.action.pdf">2022-CC-01542&nbsp;ACTION RESTORATION, INC. VS. CITY OF LAKE CHARLES</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Calcasieu)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-1587.CC.action.pdf">2022-CC-01587&nbsp;ACTION RESTORATION, INC. VS. CITY OF LAKE CHARLES</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Calcasieu)</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>On the <span class="nrdate">27th day of October, 2022</span> the following action was taken by the Supreme Court of Louisiana in the case(s) listed below:</p><h1>Writ application granted. See per curiam:</h1><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-1535.CJ.PC.pdf">2022-CJ-01535&nbsp;KAITLYN LEBOUEF VS. CALEB AGUILLARD</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Lafayette)</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>On the <span class="nrdate">1st day of November, 2022</span> the following action was taken by the Supreme Court of Louisiana in the case(s) listed below:</p><h1>Writ application granted - see briefing notice and Order:</h1><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-1072.C.action.pdf">2022-C-01072&nbsp;SHARON TISDALE VS. DAVID HEDRICK AS SHERIFF OF CONCORDIA PARISH AND MATTHEW MORGAN</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Concordia)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-1088.C.action.pdf">2022-C-01088&nbsp;NEWTEK SMALL BUSINESS FINANCE, LLC AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST BY MERGER TO NEWTEK SMALL BUSINESS FINANCE, INC. VS. ROBERT A. BAKER AND ELSA M. BAKER</a>&nbsp;(Parish of St. Tammany)</p><h1>Writ application granted in part. See per curiam:</h1><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-1059.C.PC.pdf">2022-C-01059&nbsp;BRYAN ARNOLD RICHMAN, JR. VS. THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, ET AL.</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Calcasieu)<br />Hughes, J., dissents.<br />Crichton, J., would grant and docket.</p><h1>Writ application granted in part; denied in part. See per curiam:</h1><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-1403.KH.PC.pdf">2022-KH-01403&nbsp;STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. SCOTT ERIC HOUSTON</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Caddo)<br />Crichton, J., recused in case number 2022-KH-01403 only.<br />McCallum, J., recused in case number 2022-KH-01403 only.</p><h1>Writ application granted. See per curiam:</h1><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-0508.KP.PC.pdf">2022-KP-00508&nbsp;STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. KEVIN O'BRIEN ALLEN</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Bossier)<br /><a href="/opinions/2022/22-0508.KP.jdh.con.pdf">Hughes, J., concurs and assigns reasons.</a><br /><a href="/opinions/2022/22-0508.KP.wjc.dis.pdf">Crain, J., dissents and assigns reasons.</a></p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-0844.CI.PC.pdf">2022-CI-00844&nbsp;CHARLES BUTLER VS. LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY &amp; CORRECTIONS</a>&nbsp;(Parish of East Baton Rouge)<br />Weimer, C.J., dissent.<br />Crichton, J., dissent.<br />Crain, J., dissent.</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-0969.C.PC.pdf">2022-C-00969&nbsp;J. SCHUYLER MARVIN, 26th JUDICIAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY VS. ROBERT BERRY, and CYPRESS BLACK BAYOU RECREATION And WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Bossier)<br />Crichton, J., dissents.</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-1162.C.PC.pdf">2022-C-01162&nbsp;SAULSBURY INDUSTRIES, INC. VS. CABOT CORPORATION AND CLECO POWER, LLC</a>&nbsp;(Parish of St. Mary)<br />Genovese, J., dissents.</p><h1>Petition for voluntary resignation from the practice of law granted. See order:</h1><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-1376.OB.PC.pdf">2022-OB-01376&nbsp;IN RE: L. PAUL HOOD, JR.</a></p><h1>Joint petition for consent discipline accepted. See per curiam:</h1><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-1395.B.PC.pdf">2022-B-01395&nbsp;IN RE: CHRISTOPHER SZETO</a><br />Weimer, C.J., would conditionally reject consent discipline.<br />Crichton, J., would conditionally reject consent discipline.</p><h1>Denied:</h1><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-1211.OB.action.pdf">2022-OB-01211&nbsp;IN RE: APPEAL OF THE DECISION OF THE DISCIPLINARY BOARD NO. 22-PDB-010</a></p><h1>Writ application not considered - La.S.Ct.R. X, &sect; 5(b):</h1><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-0558.KH.action.pdf">2022-KH-00558&nbsp;STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. GREGORY WAYNE COTTON</a>&nbsp;(Parish of St. Tammany)</p><h1>Writ application not considered. Not timely filed. See Louisiana Supreme Court Rule X, &sect; 5(a):</h1><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-1125.KH.action.pdf">2022-KH-01125&nbsp;STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. SCOTT ERIC HOUSTON</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Caddo)<br />Crichton, J., recused in case number 2022-KH-01125 only.<br />McCallum, J., recused in case number 2022-KH-01125 only.</p><h1>Application for reconsideration denied:</h1><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-0294.KH.action.re.pdf">2022-KH-00294&nbsp;STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. LONNIE KAHOE</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Orleans Criminal)</p><h1>Stay denied. Writ application denied:</h1><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-1318.CC.action.pdf">2022-CC-01318&nbsp;WAFAA ELWAKIL VS. BURLINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY, GO AUTO INSURANCE COMPANY AND YECENIA Y. BARRERA</a>&nbsp;(Parish of St. Charles)</p><h1>Writ application denied. Moot:</h1><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-0990.KH.action.pdf">2022-KH-00990&nbsp;STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. SCOTT ERIC HOUSTON</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Caddo)<br />Crichton, J., recused in case number 2022-KH-00990 only.<br />McCallum, J., recused in case number 2022-KH-00990 only.</p><h1>Writ application denied - Applicant has previously exhausted his right to state collateral review. See State v. Reynolds, 2020-00945 (La. 1/12/21), 308 So.3d 288:</h1><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-0905.KH.action.pdf">2022-KH-00905&nbsp;STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. JEFFREY M. REYNOLDS</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Livingston)</p><h1>Writ application denied - Applicant has previously exhausted his right to state collateral review and fails to show that any exception permits his successive filing. See State ex rel. Stevenson v. Cain, 15-1084 (La. 9/25/15), 175 So.3d 392:</h1><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-1319.KP.action.pdf">2022-KP-01319&nbsp;STATE EX REL. BRANDON STEVENSON VS. STATE OF LOUISIANA</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Jefferson)<br />Griffin, J., would grant.</p><h1>Writ application denied. See per curiam:</h1><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-0742.KH.PC.pdf">2022-KH-00742&nbsp;STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. EDWARD C. WARREN</a>&nbsp;(Parish of St. Tammany)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-0983.KK.PC.pdf">2022-KK-00983&nbsp;STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. JAMAAL EDWARDS</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Jefferson)<br />Hughes, J., would grant.</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-1045.KP.PC.pdf">2022-KP-01045&nbsp;STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. AHMON JAVON FABRE</a>&nbsp;(Parish of St. Tammany)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-1116.C.PC.pdf">2022-C-01116&nbsp;SUCCESSION OF LUCILLE WATTS PATIN, PAMELA SUE PATIN QUANTZ, CHARLEEN PATIN TAYLOR, REBEL KELLEY CAPLINGER, DENIS CURTIN KELLEY, II, DORCAS MARIE KELLEY, KERRY WATTS KELLEY, AND PATIN-KELLEY, LLC VS. BREAZEALE, SACHSE &amp; WILSON, L.L.P., DAVID M. CHARLTON, AND XYZ INSURANCE COMPANY ("XYZ")</a>&nbsp;(Parish of East Baton Rouge)<br />Hughes, J., would grant.<br />Griffin, J., would grant.</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-1123.KP.PC.pdf">2022-KP-01123&nbsp;HOUSTON JACKSON VS. TIM HOOPER, WARDEN</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Jefferson)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-1146.KH.PC.pdf">2022-KH-01146&nbsp;STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. CHARLES W. DEAL</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Rapides)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-1147.KH.PC.pdf">2022-KH-01147&nbsp;STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. JEFFERY DWAYNE DUCOTE, SR.</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Rapides)</p><h1>Writ application denied:</h1><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-0617.KH.action.pdf">2022-KH-00617&nbsp;STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. LIONEL DAVIS</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Orleans Criminal)<br /><a href="/opinions/2022/22-0617.KH.jdh.con.pdf">Hughes, J., concurs with reasons.</a></p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-0812.KH.action.pdf">2022-KH-00812&nbsp;STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. VICTOR L. DURDEN</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Caddo)<br />McCallum, J., recused in case number 2022-KH-00812 only.<br />Crichton, J., recused in case number 2022-KH-00812 only.</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-0866.KH.action.pdf">2022-KH-00866&nbsp;STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. JAMES H. FORREST</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Livingston)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-0938.C.action.pdf">2022-C-00938&nbsp;DYRANESHIA WARREN, ET AL. VS. HDI GLOBAL INSURANCE COMPANY; ET AL.</a>&nbsp;(Parish of St. Charles)<br />Weimer, C. J., recused in case number 2022-C-00938 only.<br />Crain, J., would grant.<br />McCallum, J., would grant.</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-0941.KP.action.pdf">2022-KP-00941&nbsp;STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. LEONIDAS DEAN LOWRY</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Concordia)<br />Genovese, J., recused in case number 2022-KP-00941 only.<br /><a href="/opinions/2022/22-0941.KP.sjc.grant.pdf">Crichton, J., would grant and docket and assigns reasons.</a><br />Griffin, J., would grant and docket for reasons assigned by Justice Crichton.</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-0959.C.action.pdf">2022-C-00959&nbsp;CELCOG L.L.C. DBA STRAWN'S EAT SHOP TOO, MONJUNI'S OF PORTICO, INC., AIR U SHREVEPORT, LLC, THE BRAIN TRAIN, LLC, AND BEARING SERVICE &amp; SUPPLY, INC. VS. ADRIAN PERKINS, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS MAYOR OF THE CITY OF SHREVEPORT, LOUISIANA</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Caddo)<br />Hughes, J., would grant.<br />Crain, J., would grant.<br />Griffin, J., would grant.</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-0988.KH.action.pdf">2022-KH-00988&nbsp;STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. LARRY THOMPSON, SR.</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Bossier)<br />Griffin, J., would grant.</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-0991.CC.action.pdf">2022-CC-00991&nbsp;NORMA VANESSA MARTINEZ VS. STATE OF LOUISIANA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Plaquemines)<br />Weimer, C.J., concurs, finding an adequate remedy on appeal.<br />Crichton, J., would grant and docket.<br />Crain, J., would grant.<br /><a href="/opinions/2022/22-0991.CC.jbm.grant.pdf">McCallum, J., would grant and docket and assigns reasons.</a></p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-0995.CC.action.pdf">2022-CC-00995&nbsp;DENNIS SURGENOR VS. UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER, STATE OF LA, LSUHSC-NEW ORLEANS, AND DR. WILLIAM RISHER</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Orleans Civil)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-1002.C.action.pdf">2022-C-01002&nbsp;DYRANESHIA WARREN, ET AL. VS. HDI GLOBAL INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL.</a>&nbsp;(Parish of St. Charles)<br />Weimer, C. J., recused in case number 2022-C-01002 only.</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-1030.KK.action.pdf">2022-KK-01030&nbsp;STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. DARRYL SMITH</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Jefferson)<br />Hughes, J., would grant.<br />Genovese, J., would grant.<br />Griffin, J., would grant.</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-1031.KH.action.pdf">2022-KH-01031&nbsp;STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. RODNEY B. BAHM</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Rapides)<br /><a href="/opinions/2022/22-1031.KH.jdh.con.pdf">Hughes, J., concurs and assigns reasons.</a></p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-1060.OC.action.pdf">2022-OC-01060&nbsp;BRYAN ARNOLD RICHMAN, JR. VS. THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, ET AL.</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Calcasieu)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-1065.CC.action.pdf">2022-CC-01065&nbsp;R. T. TALLEY VS. LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT</a>&nbsp;(Parish of East Baton Rouge)<br />Hughes, J., recused in case number 2022-CC-01065 only.<br />Crain, J., would grant.</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-1099.KP.action.pdf">2022-KP-01099&nbsp;STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. MARIO JAMAL VILTZ</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Calcasieu)<br />Crichton, J., would grant.<br />Crain, J., would grant.<br />McCallum, J., would grant.</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-1102.KH.action.pdf">2022-KH-01102&nbsp;STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. AVIS WILLIAMS</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Terrebonne)<br />Weimer, C. J., recused in case number 2022-KH-01102 only.<br />Crain, J., recused in case number 2022-KH-01102 only.</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-1109.C.action.pdf">2022-C-01109&nbsp;DEE WAYNE THURMAN VS. JESUS AGUILAR, EMPOWER INSURANCE GROUP, JESUS HERNANDEZ, PEAK PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE, MARY HEFLEBOWER AND ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY</a>&nbsp;(Parish of St. Tammany)<br />Genovese, J., would grant.<br />Griffin, J., would grant.</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-1110.C.action.pdf">2022-C-01110&nbsp;DEE WAYNE THURMAN VS. JESUS AGUILAR, EMPOWER INSURANCE GROUP, JESUS HERNANDEZ, PEAK PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE, MARY HEFLEBOWER AND ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY</a>&nbsp;(Parish of St. Tammany)<br />Genovese, J., would grant.<br />Griffin, J., would grant.</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-1111.CC.action.pdf">2022-CC-01111&nbsp;VEDA RACHELLE GUYLLETTE, WIFE OF/AND WILLIAM W. JENKINS VS. AMERICAN TELEPHONE &amp; TELEGRAPH (AT&amp;T)</a>&nbsp;(Parish of St. Tammany)<br />Hughes, J., would grant.<br />Genovese, J., would grant.<br />Griffin, J., would grant.</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-1115.C.action.pdf">2022-C-01115&nbsp;STATE OF LOUISIANA, MILITARY DEPARTMENT AND DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, OFFICE OF STATE POLICE VS. EXPLO SYSTEMS, INC., CRUM AND FORSTER SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY AND SENECA SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY C/W EMPLOYERS MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY A/S/O THE VILLAGE OF DIXIE INN, LOUISIANA VS. EXPLO SYSTEMS, INC., AND CRUM &amp; FORSTER SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Webster)<br /><a href="/opinions/2022/22-1115.C.sjc.con.pdf">Crichton, J., additionally concurs and assigns reasons.</a></p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-1121.C.action.pdf">2022-C-01121&nbsp;MARGARET TURNER, ET AL. VS. CAJUN OPERATING COMPANY (OF DELAWARE) D/B/A CHURCH'S CHICKEN, ET AL.</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Ouachita)<br />Hughes, J., would grant.</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-1130.CC.action.pdf">2022-CC-01130&nbsp;JACQUENLINE LEWIS VS. LADARIUS CUTRIGHT, ALLSTATE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY AND GEICO CASUALTY COMPANY</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Caddo)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-1131.KK.action.pdf">2022-KK-01131&nbsp;STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. CORNELIUS ROSS</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Orleans Criminal)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-1138.CC.action.pdf">2022-CC-01138&nbsp;IN RE MEDICAL REVIEW PANEL PROCEEDINGS FOR THE CLAIM OF DENNIS SURGENOR (D), ET AL. VS. UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER-NEW ORLEANS</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Orleans Civil)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-1156.CC.action.pdf">2022-CC-01156&nbsp;KRISTA POUNCY VS. ERIC HOLT</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Orleans Civil)<br />Hughes, J., would grant.<br />Griffin, J., would grant.</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-1157.C.action.pdf">2022-C-01157&nbsp;CURTIS JOSEPH LAWRENCE VS. ASHTON PLANTATION HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.</a>&nbsp;(Parish of St. Charles)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-1158.C.action.pdf">2022-C-01158&nbsp;LONESOME DEVELOPMENT, LLC VS. TOWN OF ABITA SPRINGS</a>&nbsp;(Parish of St. Tammany)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-1159.C.action.pdf">2022-C-01159&nbsp;GEORGE MATTHEW CULBERTSON AND SARAH ELIZABETH CULBERTSON VS. WELLS FARGO USA HOLDINGS, INC., WELLS FARGO, N.A., WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE, INC., STEVE RANNEY, AND MATTHEW KRUEGER</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Caddo)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-1160.C.action.pdf">2022-C-01160&nbsp;MANAGEMENT GROUP FOUR, L.L.C. VS. L B ELECTRIC, L.L.C.</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Desoto)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-1163.CC.action.pdf">2022-CC-01163&nbsp;SHADIA CAMACHO VS. OCHSNER CLINIC FOUNDATION, ET AL.</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Orleans Civil)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-1165.CC.action.pdf">2022-CC-01165&nbsp;SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVICING, LLC VS. MONIQUE L. HIBBS, A/K/A MONIQUE HIBBS</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Livingston)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-1168.C.action.pdf">2022-C-01168&nbsp;STEVE CROOKS, ET AL. VS. STATE OF LOUISIANA, THROUGH THE DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Rapides)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-1169.C.action.pdf">2022-C-01169&nbsp;JENNY ANN BADEAUX VS. ST. TAMMANY PARISH HOSPITAL SERVICE DISTRICT NO. 1 D/B/A ST. TAMMANY PARISH HOSPITAL</a>&nbsp;(Parish of St. Tammany)<br />Hughes, J., would grant.</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-1172.C.action.pdf">2022-C-01172&nbsp;CITY OF BATON ROUGE AND PARISH OF EAST BATON ROUGE VS. GIOVANNI MUCCIACCIARO</a>&nbsp;(Parish of East Baton Rouge)<br />Hughes, J., would grant.</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-1190.C.action.pdf">2022-C-01190&nbsp;RICO LEWIS AND KIM LEWIS VS. ERIN WIEBER, PROGRESSIVE DIRECT INSURANCE COMPANY, ACME TRUCK LINE, INC., AND XYZ INSURANCE COMPANY C/W ERIN WIEBER, WIFE OF/AND SCOTT WIEBER, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF THEIR MINOR CHILDREN MACKENZIE WIEBER AND AIDAN WIEBER, AND BRENNAN WIEBER VS. ACME TRUCK LINE, INC., RICO LEWIS, JR., HUDSON INSURANCE COMPANY, ABC INSURANCE COMPANY AND XYZ INSURANCE COMPANY</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Orleans Civil)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-1193.C.action.pdf">2022-C-01193&nbsp;TIFFANY WINES VS. JAMILA HOLLINGSQUEST AND GEICO CASUALTY COMPANY</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Union)<br />Hughes, J., would grant.</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-1194.CC.action.pdf">2022-CC-01194&nbsp;JOHNNY POURCIAU VS. EARL DEMPSEY PENDARVIS</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Ascension)<br />Hughes, J., would grant.</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-1200.CC.action.pdf">2022-CC-01200&nbsp;DALE FLYNN, JR. VS. TANGIPAHOA PARISH RECREATION DIST. 39A, NORTH TANGIPAHOA SOCCER ASSOCIATION, TANGIPAHOA PARISH GOVERNMENT, THE LOUISIANA SOCCER ASSOCIATION, JODY JOHNSON, MICHAEL LARRY GARAFALO, ABC INSURANCE COMPANY, DEF INSURANCE COMPANY, GHI INSURANCE COMPANY, JKL INSURANCE COMPANY, MNO INSURANCE COMPANY, AND POR INSURANCE COMPANY</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Tangipahoa)</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-1217.K.action.pdf">2022-K-01217&nbsp;STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. DEVONTAE DEMARQUIS COLEMAN</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Ouachita)<br />Crichton, J., would grant and docket.<br />Crain, J., would grant and docket.<br />McCallum, J., would grant and docket.</p><p><a href="/opinions/2022/22-1444.CJ.action.pdf">2022-CJ-01444&nbsp;JAMES W. BAKER VS. DANIELLE PERRET</a>&nbsp;(Parish of Washington)<br />Hughes, J., recused in case number 2022-CJ-01444 only.</p><p>&nbsp;</p></div></div>
                </div>

</div>