<table cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" width="90%"><tbody><tr valign="top"><td valign="top" width="63%">FOR IMMEDIATE NEWS RELEASE</td><td valign="top" width="37%"><div align="right">NEWS RELEASE #019</div></td></tr><tr valign="top"><td valign="top">FROM: CLERK OF SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA</td><td valign="top"> </td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p style="text-align:justify;">The Opinions handed down on the <span style="text-decoration:underline;"><strong>9th day of March, 2007</strong></span>, are as follows:</p><p style="text-align:justify;"> </p><p style="text-align:justify;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><strong>BY CALOGERO, C.J.:</strong></span></p><p style="text-align:justify;"><a href="/opinions/2007/06C1077.opn.pdf">2006-C- 1077 SID HEBERT, SHERIFF v. KATIE M. HOLLIER, ET AL.</a> (Parish of Iberia)<br />For the reasons stated herein, the judgment of the court of appeal is<br />reversed and the judgment of the trial court denying the Motion to Recind the Tax Redemption is reinstated.<br />REVERSED; TRIAL COURT JUDGMENT REINSTATED.<br /><br />Retired Judge Philip C. Ciaccio, ad hoc, sitting for Traylor, J., recused.</p><p style="text-align:justify;">JOHNSON, J., concurs.</p><p style="text-align:justify;"> </p><p style="text-align:justify;"> </p><p style="text-align:justify;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><strong>BY JOHNSON, J.:</strong></span></p><p style="text-align:justify;"><a href="/opinions/2007/06C0999.opn.pdf">2006-C- 0999 CALVIN RABALAIS AND MERION RABALAIS v. LLOYD A. NASH, JR., ET AL.</a>(Parish of Avoyelles)<br />For the foregoing reasons, we reverse the ruling of the court of appeal and reinstate the judgment of the trial court.<br />REVERSED AND JUDGMENT OF TRIAL COURT REINSTATED</p><p style="text-align:justify;">CALOGERO, C.J., dissents and assigns reasons.<br />VICTORY, J., additionally concurs for the reasons assigned by Weimer, J.<br />KNOLL, J., dissents and assigns reasons.<br />WEIMER, J., additionally concurs and assigns reasons.</p><p style="text-align:justify;"> </p><p style="text-align:justify;"> </p><p style="text-align:justify;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><strong>BY VICTORY, J.:</strong></span></p><p style="text-align:justify;"><a href="/opinions/2007/06C1181.opn.pdf">2006-C- 1181 BETTY JO H. WRIGHT, ET AL v. LOUISIANA POWER & LIGHT, ET AL.</a> (Parish of Ouachita)<br />For the reasons stated herein, the judgment of the court of appeal is<br />reversed, and the judgment of the trial court granting defendants' motion for summary judgment is reinstated.<br />REVERSED.</p><p style="text-align:justify;">KNOLL, J., dissents and assigns reasons.</p><p style="text-align:justify;"> </p><p style="text-align:justify;"> </p><p style="text-align:justify;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><strong>PER CURIAM:</strong></span></p><p style="text-align:justify;"><a href="/opinions/2007/06CA0702.opn.pdf">2006-CA-0702 W.R.M. v. H.C.V. AND M.J.V.</a> (Parish of Calcasieu)<br />The judgment of the court of appeal is vacated and set aside. W.R.M.'s petition to establish filiation is dismissed with prejudice.</p><p style="text-align:justify;">CALOGERO, C.J., assigns additional concurring reasons.<br />KIMBALL, J., additionally concurs for reasons assigned by Calogero, C.J.<br />JOHNSON, J., additionally concurs and assigns reasons.<br />TRAYLOR, J., concurs and assigns reasons.<br />WEIMER, J., additionally concurs and assigns reasons.</p><p> </p>